Integrating in-situ monitoring and EO in the framework of GMES and GEOSS

The GMES and GEOSS initiatives, in concert with other activities, are creating a paradigm change in geo-spatial and environmental information sharing and recognise that geo-spatial products and services are key to both economic return and management of global issues.

Integrating in-situ monitoring and EO in the framework of GMES GEOSS

Programme ìIntegrating in-situ monitoring and Earth Observation in the framework of GMES and GEOSSî

Open cluster meeting Brussels, May 31st, 2007

Earth Monitoring is at a turning point world wide. The awareness of the risks inherent to an uncontrolled development of human activities has led to environmental protocols, to the setup of new partnerships, such as the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) and the European GMES initiative (Global Monitoring of Environment and Security), and the need to develop synergies between existing capacities internationally. GMES has already gathered substantial momentum through the actions of the European Union and European Space Agencies and through the wide ranging participation of European industry. The initiative encompasses in-situ, airborne and spaceborne sensor deployment, ground infrastructures and data processing, value added data production and interpretation, up to extending aid for Environment and Security decision-making.

The last decade has seen huge progress in sensor network technologies: small computers and sensors costing tens of euros, tiny operating systems running in hundreds of bytes of memory, short-range radios consuming minimal power, and multi-hop networks covering local areas. As sensor network research continues, one trend is “bigger”: more powerful computers and sensors, higher-level operating systems services, mixes of radio technologies, and wide-area networks connecting sensornets in global deployments; another trend is “smaller” very cheap throw away sensors (RFID and beyond). In the meantime, remote sensing is becoming increasingly accurate and flexible, and these improvements are now in the process of being successfully applied to high altitude platforms and UAV, which present new and added possibilities for earth observation.

It is by now well accepted that the proper monitoring of our planet will require the use of both in-situ and remote sensing techniques. While these approaches are operationally very different, they have each an essential role to play in any serious plan to monitor a site, region, country, or the Earth as a whole. Unfortunately this synergy is neither yet realised nor fully appreciated, in part because of the different technologies involved and skills required to operate them, in part because of the resilience of traditional working practices (resistance to change), in part also because of arguments linked to training; to the need to implement new tools and models, just to name a few.

The objectives of the workshop were:

AGENDA (pdf)

Welcome (09h00-09h30)

G. Weets (EU-DG INFSO), P. Kamoun (EARSC)

Discussion 1: Sensors network architecture: (09h30-10h30)

Moderator: J. Pereira (EU-DG-INFSO)

Coffee Break

Discussion 2: Pilot implementations: (10h45-12h30)

Moderator: K. Fabbri (EU-DG-INFSO)

Lunch Break

Discussion 3: Integration of in-situ and EO sensors: (14h00-15h00)

Moderator: P. Kamoun (EARSC)

Round Table 1: Integration of in-situ and EO sensors: (15h00-16h00)

Moderator: P. Kamoun (EARSC)

Coffee Break

Round table 2: Infrastructure and Policies: (16h15-17h00)

Moderator: M. Monteiro (EU-DG-INFSO)

Final Round table: îTechnology and Systems Roadmap: whatís nextî (17h00-17h30)

Moderator: M. Schoupe (EU-DG-INFSO). Rapporteur: Y. Coene (Spacebel)

Participants: G. Weets (EU-DG-INFSO), W. Steinborn (EU-DG-ENT), V. Gabaglio (EUMETSAT), G. Rum (GEO), M. Erhard (EEA), B.L. Bye (ESEAS)

PDF: ec-earsc-ws-final-report_en.pdf


|